Forums, Trackers, and Mirrors: Mapping How Creator Content Gets Re-Distributed

A data-led look at how pirated and non-consensual creator content moves through forums, torrent trackers, Telegram, and mirror sites — and why takedowns rarely stick.

NE

Noticeora Enforcement Desk · Takedown & Compliance Team

Files DMCA and TAKE IT DOWN Act notices daily across platforms, hosts, and search engines.

Published September 9, 2026 · 10 min read

Pirated and non-consensually shared creator content rarely lives in one place. Once a photo, video, or subscription-platform file leaks, it typically gets copied across forums, torrent trackers, Telegram channels, and mirror domains faster than any single takedown notice can follow — a redistribution pattern that shows up consistently across recent piracy, platform-safety, and child-safety research.

1. The scale of piracy traffic today

Global piracy traffic is enormous even as it declines year over year, which sets the baseline for how much redistribution infrastructure exists to move content once it's exposed.

MetricValueSource
Total visits to piracy sites globally, 2025 (film, TV, publishing, music, software)185.6 billion visitsMUSO
Year-over-year change in piracy traffic, 2025-14.2% (steepest decline since 2020)MUSO
Total piracy site visits, 2024 (prior-year baseline)216.3 billion visitsMUSO
Manga's share of publishing-sector piracy traffic, 202573.09% (up from 70.15% in 2024)MUSO

185.6B

visits to piracy websites globally in 2025 — down 14.2% from 2024 but still measured in the hundreds of billions.

MUSO 2025 Piracy Trends and Insights Report

Global piracy site visits, 2024 vs. 2025

Even a double-digit year-over-year decline still leaves piracy traffic in the hundreds of billions of visits — the infrastructure for redistribution hasn't disappeared, it's consolidated.

MUSO 2025 Piracy Trends and Insights Report

2. CSAM hosting and redistribution infrastructure

Because non-consensual and underage material gets tracked more rigorously than general piracy, hotline data offers the clearest picture of how aggressively hosting and re-hosting scale over time.

Self-generated CSAM items confirmed, 2025140,276 items (27% of all confirmed content)Internet Watch Foundation
Unique domains actioned for hosting confirmed CSAM, 20257,268 domains (+20% YoY)Internet Watch Foundation
'TLD hopping' domain moves to evade takedown, 2025514 hops across 133 domain strings (+74% YoY)Internet Watch Foundation
Confirmed CSAM URLs, 2022 vs. 2019255,588 URLs (2022) vs. 132,676 URLs (2019)IWF via Statista
Commercial CSAM concentration on Germany's .de domain, 2023~25% of commercial sites, 3,000+ criminal addressesIWF via Euronews
Confirmed CSAM webpages out of reports assessed, 2023275,652 of 392,665 reportsIWF via Clyde & Co

7,268

unique domains the Internet Watch Foundation actioned for hosting confirmed CSAM in 2025 — up 20% year on year.

Internet Watch Foundation, 2025 Annual Data & Insights Report

Domain hopping isn't a fringe tactic — it's the default survival strategy for commercial abuse sites once a domain gets flagged.

Internet Watch Foundation, 2025 Annual Data & Insights Report

Domain concentration on a single country-code TLD, as seen with Germany's .de domain in 2023, and the near-doubling of confirmed CSAM URLs between 2019 and 2022, both point to the same underlying dynamic: enforcement against one host or domain rarely removes the underlying content from circulation, it just relocates it.

3. Reporting pipelines and enforcement scale

The reporting and takedown systems built to catch redistributed content now operate at a scale that itself illustrates how much material is moving.

MetricValueSource
CyberTipline reports of suspected child exploitation, 202521.3 million reports, 61.8 million filesNCMEC
Share of NCMEC's H1 2025 "Generative AI" reports found to involve no actual AI-generated material~80%Stanford Cyber Policy Center
Google Search copyright-removal URLs processed, 2025 alone5 billion URLsTorrentFreak / Google
Share of Google's cumulative copyright removal requests filed by a single anti-piracy vendor since 2012>30% (3.2 billion URLs in 2025 alone)TorrentFreak
Cumulative allegedly-infringing URLs reported to Google Search as of September 2025~14.5 billion URLsTorrentFreak / Google
Google's stated average processing time for a Search removal request~6 hoursGoogle

5B

copyright-removal URLs Google Search processed in 2025 alone.

TorrentFreak, analyzing Google Transparency Report data

A single vendor filing over 30% of all copyright removal requests since 2012 shows how automated the reporting side has become — the redistribution side automates just as fast.

TorrentFreak, Google Transparency Report analysis

The Stanford Cyber Policy Center's finding that roughly 80% of a mass hash-matching submission of "Generative AI" CyberTipline reports involved no actual AI-generated material is a reminder that classification tags on redistributed content — including within enforcement pipelines — can be unreliable at scale.

4. Telegram and channel-based redistribution networks

Beyond forums and torrent trackers, encrypted-messaging channels have become a documented redistribution layer of their own, with researchers now mapping their structure directly.

MetricValueSource
Telegram channels and unique posts studied in a video-piracy mapping (Dec 2023–Jan 2026)1,057 channels, 209,000 unique postsarXiv preprint, Gyawali et al.
Estimated lower-bound financial loss from the mapped Telegram piracy ecosystem$17.49 billionarXiv preprint, Gyawali et al.
Channels and bots removed in a 61-day automated enforcement run524 channels, 71 botsarXiv preprint, Gyawali et al.

209,000

unique posts researchers catalogued across 1,057 Telegram piracy channels in a single mapping study.

Gyawali et al., arXiv preprint

Content was deliberately routed through resilient chains of intermediary channels and bots — removing one link rarely breaks the chain.

Gyawali et al., arXiv preprint on Telegram piracy infrastructure

Even a sustained 61-day enforcement effort in that study only reached 524 channels and 71 bots out of a mapped ecosystem more than twice that size — evidence that channel-based redistribution networks are built with redundancy from the start.

5. Torrent sites, mirrors, and whack-a-mole takedowns

Torrent trackers illustrate the oldest version of this pattern: shutting down a site rarely removes its content or its community, since both tend to reappear under a new name almost immediately.

MetricValueSource
Major torrent sites/trackers shut down by enforcement action since 2004~20 major sitesCogipas.com
Typical reappearance window for a new KickassTorrents-branded mirrorWithin hours to daysPosition Is Everything

~20

major torrent sites shut down by enforcement action since 2004 — most persisted afterward as mirrors, clones, or brand-hijacking successors.

Cogipas.com

When a KickassTorrents mirror goes down, a replacement using the same brand typically resurfaces within hours to days — the name outlives any single domain.

Position Is Everything

6. Forums and dark web marketplaces for creator content

Subscription-platform content specifically flows through a mix of open forums and structured dark web marketplaces, both of which researchers have started to quantify directly.

MetricValueSource
Distinct illicit forums/marketplaces operating on the dark webAt least several hundredRecorded Future
Membership range across dark web forumsA couple hundred to hundreds of thousands of registered usersRecorded Future
Estimated share of paid OnlyFans content stolen and redistributed without permission50-70%Ceartas DMCA via Unbias the News
Monthly visits to Celebforum (April 2025), a forum hosting non-consensual OnlyFans contentOver 7 million visitsUnbias the News
Surveyed European creators reporting stolen/redistributed content without consent23 of 32 interviewed (~72%)Unbias the News
Scale/price of a 2026 dark-web listing claiming to package OnlyFans creator data340 million records, 0.313 BTC (~$76,000)Security Affairs
Same alleged dataset, independently reported340 million records, ~£60,000IBTimes UK

7M+

monthly visits Celebforum received in April 2025 — a single forum built around non-consensual OnlyFans content.

Unbias the News investigation

Twenty-three of the 32 creators we interviewed said their content had been stolen and redistributed without consent — this isn't a rare edge case, it's close to the norm.

Unbias the News investigation

Notably, both reports on the alleged 340-million-record OnlyFans dataset trace it back to older, unrelated breaches (Twitter, Instagram, Spotify) repackaged and resold rather than a fresh platform hack — a pattern of "rebuilding" scraped or breached data into new forum listings that mirrors how leaked media itself gets repackaged and re-posted.

7. Deepfake redistribution channels

Non-consensual deepfake content moves through many of the same channels, with its own dedicated dark corners and rapidly growing report volumes.

MetricValueSource
Share of deepfake content that is sexual in nature~98%Sensity AI
Deepfake-related sex crime reports in South Korea, 2023 to 2024423 reports to 1,384 reportsSensity AI, citing South Korea's Digital Sex Crime Victim Support Centre
Subscribers on some Telegram deepfake-generation chat roomsUp to 200,000Sensity AI
AI-generated CSAM videos assessed by IWF, year over year3,443 videos, up from 13 (a 26,385% increase)Sensity AI, citing IWF 2025 data

26,385%

year-over-year increase in AI-generated CSAM videos assessed by the Internet Watch Foundation.

Sensity AI, citing IWF 2025 data

All content hosted on the five most-visited deepfake porn sites is non-consensual — this isn't a scattered problem, it's a dedicated, purpose-built distribution layer.

Sensity AI

Key numbers at a glance

MetricValue
Global piracy site visits, 2025185.6 billion
Domains IWF actioned for CSAM hosting, 20257,268
Google Search copyright-removal URLs processed, 20255 billion
Telegram piracy channels mapped in one study1,057
Estimated share of paid OnlyFans content stolen50-70%
Celebforum monthly visits, April 20257 million+
YoY increase in AI-generated CSAM videos26,385%

Sources

Protect your creators before the next leak appears

Facial-recognition detection and legal enforcement, under one flat subscription.

Related reading